(10)
http://best-Mobile-Handset-mobile-review.blogspot.in/
Motorola Droid Razr MAXX Tech Review, Retail Price Update
Released in January of this year, the Motorola Droid Razr MAXX 4G is a thicker Droid Razr 4G copycat. When tasked with the job of creating the slimmest 4G smartphone ever designed, while still adding respectable software and hardware, Motorola engineers came up with the Motorola Droid Razr 4G. that handset arrived on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network, and immediately became a best seller for that wireless carrier.
Skinny phones usually mean there’s not enough junk in the trunk to deliver high-end battery performance, but Motorola did not want to make a handset without adding all the attractive features possessed by the Droid Razr 4G. So back to the drawing board they went, where they designed an 85% larger battery on virtually the same chassis, and with the same features, as the Droid Razr.
That fatter, high efficiency battery delivers a full 21.5 hours of talk time from a single charge, the max offering found on any 4G handset, thus giving the Motorola Droid Razr MAXX 4G its name. The handset also delivers a 4G-best 32 GB of out-of-the-box, user accessible storage, in the form of 16 GB built into the handset and a removable 16 GB microSD card that ships with the phone. However, in keeping with the thin design of the Droid Razr, Motorola engineers and designers did a great job keeping the Droid Razr MAXX as thin as possible. That handset measures only 0.35 inches (8.99 mm) in thickness, making it one of the slimmest 4G smartphones around.
The unique looking Kevlar and aluminum coated, splash-proof handset is further protected by a layer of scratch resistant Corning Gorilla Glass, and Verizon recently dropped the retail price of the Droid Razr MAXX 4G to $99 on contract at select retailers. The display runs 4.30 inches, and that Super AMOLED screen renders visuals in 16 million unique colors and 256 pixels per inch, for an overall display resolution of 540 x 960 pixels. Standard capacitive, multitouch gestures are used to navigate the device.
That 4G leading 21.5 hours of talk time is joined by 15.8 days of standby, and a Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 microchip package powers the handset. The dual core Cortex A9 central processor has been clocked at 1.2 GHz, and graphics are handled by a PowerVR SGX540 GPU. 1.0 GB of RAM system memory is on board, and the 8.0 megapixel on the back of the handset delivers video capture at a high resolution 1,080P HD. A 1.3 megapixel chat cam is located on the front of the Droid Razr MAXX 4G, and also offers video call support.
The headlines and hype surrounding the entrance of Wind Mobile and other new competitors into the country’s wireless market a few years ago served to overshadow an equally transformative development in the sector, one that has simmered in the background ever since.
Over a two-day span in early November, 2009, the relationship between the three biggest players in the $18-billion business was dramatically recast when Bell Mobility and Telus Corp. teamed up to hit the switch on a new mobile Internet network.
The move introduced the possibility of fast, reliable cellular connections to the web for a huge number of Canadians. For many in rural communities outside the major centres where rival incumbent and market leader Rogers Communications Inc. was then thriving, it was a first.
It was also a first for Bell and Telus — though the pair had been selling “smartphones” for years on their respective older networks, each could now support Apple Inc.’s vaunted iPhone.
Until then, the game-changing, revenue-driving blockbuster of a device made for everyday consumers had been winning unprecedented subscription numbers for the sole Canadian carrier that could support it: Rogers.
On Nov. 4, 2009, six weeks before Wind launched in Toronto and Calgary, Rogers’ de facto iPhone monopoly was ended when Bell activated its half of the new network, followed a day later by Telus, just as a far more competitive chapter for the “Big Three” was about to begin.
The new system, deployed at record speed, has been an enormous boon for Bell and Telus in the nine quarters since, allowing each to catch up and eclipse Rogers in per-user revenue growth and achieve comparably better profits.
“We got Canada built out in less than one year — 98% covered — by basically splitting up the country and making it economical to do,” Bob McFarlane, chief financial officer for Telus, said in an interview at an industry conference this month. “That’s the benefit of having network sharing.”
But as a key auction for fresh airwaves looms, one observers say is poised to deepen the partnership and deliver to Bell and Telus the pole positions in the market for next-generation high-speed wireless Internet, detractors are stepping up criticism of the joint endeavour, suggesting the two firms are perhaps too closely aligned.
“Let’s make no mistake, Canada’s gone from three national networks to two and that is not a positive thing [for competition]. More networks are a good thing,” Ken Engelhart, senior vice-president of regulatory affairs for Rogers said at the same Canadian Telecom Summit earlier this month.
“This is not a modest sharing of the radio access network, this is a single network. They used to each have a network, now they share one,” he said.
Early next year Industry Canada will sell to carriers spectrum, or airwave frequencies, ideal for delivering Internet signals to smartphones. Rogers and others, including Wind parent Globalive Wireless Management Corp., suggest Bell and Telus will almost certainly partner again, combining their new holdings to deliver mobile signals across vast stretches of the country that will be faster — and cheaper to deploy — than any of their unallied rivals can hope to achieve in the near term.
Still, Industry Canada, the federal department overseeing the sale, has no qualms with Bell and Telus or any other carriers who share resources, including spectrum, as long as the operators are competing for customers at the retail level. The caveat is that “associated entities” must declare intentions before the auction, and demonstrate they are not colluding.
Partnerships will also trigger “build-out requirements” from which unaffiliated providers will be exempt, forcing joint network operators to build deeper into rural areas.
Competitors argue the conditions lack teeth, while the auction’s unique bidding structure gives an unfair advantage to the two incumbents.
“I don’t understand why competing at the retail level would act as a ‘get out of jail free card’. We’re talking about one entity sharing spectrum and a network. Why should competing at the retail level have anything to do with [allowing Bell and Telus to share spectrum]? It seems to me artificial,” said a person close to regulatory matters at Globalive who spoke on condition of anonymity.
“What you really want to do if you want competition at the retail level is make sure everyone is on a level playing field,” the person said.
Executives for Wind, the biggest of the upstart corps of carriers that includes Mobilicity and Quebec cable operator Vidéotron, point to the vast spectrum holdings of the Big Three, which according to Industry Canada’s data stand at 85% of all frequency licences in private hands, combined (Rogers holding 41%, BCE with 29% and Telus with 15%).
Wind, which acquired a 3% sliver in the last auction in 2008, has argued new entrants need more if they are to compete legitimately and avoid being bought out by Rogers, Bell or Telus.
If the buy-out scenario plays out, new-entrant executives suggest pricing will move inexorably back up as the oligopolistic hold the three industry giants exercised before late 2009 returns — when rates were the highest per customer among G8 countries, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch data.
To prevent this, Industry Canada has carved up four “prime” blocks to sell while capping the three incumbents to purchasing only one apiece in each jurisdiction, a design that Industry Minister Christian Paradis believes will guard the competitiveness of the marketplace.
Telus’ Mr. McFarlane, who said he is satisfied with the auction design, concurred. “They essentially reinforced a four-player industry structure,” he said.
Executives from both Telus and Bell noted during the summit that there is nothing stopping other operators from striking similar sharing agreements. They noted carriers in other countries have also undertaken such deals to save money and speed up roll-outs. Last week, Spanish giant Telefónica announcing an alliance with British operator Vodafone to share infrastructure on a joint high-speed wireless network in the United Kingdom, for example.
“We [Telus and Bell] compete vigorously in downstream markets.” Ted Woodhead, vice-president of regulatory affairs said during a panel last week that featured Rogers’ Mr. Engelhart and the regulatory chiefs of the other operators.
“Incidentally, all of these guys have talked about or their CEOs have talked about [spectrum and network sharing] but have failed to actually step up to the plate,” he said.
Mobile Opreter,
China China Mobile ,
United Kingdom Vodafone,
India Airtel,
Mobile Reviews Expert
http://best-Mobile-Handset-mobile-review.blogspot.in/
Motorola Droid Razr MAXX Tech Review, Retail Price Update
Skinny phones usually mean there’s not enough junk in the trunk to deliver high-end battery performance, but Motorola did not want to make a handset without adding all the attractive features possessed by the Droid Razr 4G. So back to the drawing board they went, where they designed an 85% larger battery on virtually the same chassis, and with the same features, as the Droid Razr.
That fatter, high efficiency battery delivers a full 21.5 hours of talk time from a single charge, the max offering found on any 4G handset, thus giving the Motorola Droid Razr MAXX 4G its name. The handset also delivers a 4G-best 32 GB of out-of-the-box, user accessible storage, in the form of 16 GB built into the handset and a removable 16 GB microSD card that ships with the phone. However, in keeping with the thin design of the Droid Razr, Motorola engineers and designers did a great job keeping the Droid Razr MAXX as thin as possible. That handset measures only 0.35 inches (8.99 mm) in thickness, making it one of the slimmest 4G smartphones around.
The unique looking Kevlar and aluminum coated, splash-proof handset is further protected by a layer of scratch resistant Corning Gorilla Glass, and Verizon recently dropped the retail price of the Droid Razr MAXX 4G to $99 on contract at select retailers. The display runs 4.30 inches, and that Super AMOLED screen renders visuals in 16 million unique colors and 256 pixels per inch, for an overall display resolution of 540 x 960 pixels. Standard capacitive, multitouch gestures are used to navigate the device.
That 4G leading 21.5 hours of talk time is joined by 15.8 days of standby, and a Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 microchip package powers the handset. The dual core Cortex A9 central processor has been clocked at 1.2 GHz, and graphics are handled by a PowerVR SGX540 GPU. 1.0 GB of RAM system memory is on board, and the 8.0 megapixel on the back of the handset delivers video capture at a high resolution 1,080P HD. A 1.3 megapixel chat cam is located on the front of the Droid Razr MAXX 4G, and also offers video call support.
Raj Rajput [ MBA ]
Mobile Reviews Expert
On Line Assistence :
Gtalk : aerosoft.Raj@gmail.com
Y! Messenger : Raj.AeroSoft@yahoo.com
Rediff Bol : Raj.AeroSoft@rediffmail.com
MSN : Raj.AeroSoft@hotmail.com
 | ||
| to Best Mobile Review | ||
Best Mobile Handset Mobile Review Best Mobile Operator Review  Best Blackberry Mobile Review  Best iphones Reviews   SEO JOBS
|
 |
 |
 |
The headlines and hype surrounding the entrance of Wind Mobile and other new competitors into the country’s wireless market a few years ago served to overshadow an equally transformative development in the sector, one that has simmered in the background ever since.
Over a two-day span in early November, 2009, the relationship between the three biggest players in the $18-billion business was dramatically recast when Bell Mobility and Telus Corp. teamed up to hit the switch on a new mobile Internet network.
The move introduced the possibility of fast, reliable cellular connections to the web for a huge number of Canadians. For many in rural communities outside the major centres where rival incumbent and market leader Rogers Communications Inc. was then thriving, it was a first.
It was also a first for Bell and Telus — though the pair had been selling “smartphones” for years on their respective older networks, each could now support Apple Inc.’s vaunted iPhone.
Until then, the game-changing, revenue-driving blockbuster of a device made for everyday consumers had been winning unprecedented subscription numbers for the sole Canadian carrier that could support it: Rogers.
On Nov. 4, 2009, six weeks before Wind launched in Toronto and Calgary, Rogers’ de facto iPhone monopoly was ended when Bell activated its half of the new network, followed a day later by Telus, just as a far more competitive chapter for the “Big Three” was about to begin.
The new system, deployed at record speed, has been an enormous boon for Bell and Telus in the nine quarters since, allowing each to catch up and eclipse Rogers in per-user revenue growth and achieve comparably better profits.
“We got Canada built out in less than one year — 98% covered — by basically splitting up the country and making it economical to do,” Bob McFarlane, chief financial officer for Telus, said in an interview at an industry conference this month. “That’s the benefit of having network sharing.”
But as a key auction for fresh airwaves looms, one observers say is poised to deepen the partnership and deliver to Bell and Telus the pole positions in the market for next-generation high-speed wireless Internet, detractors are stepping up criticism of the joint endeavour, suggesting the two firms are perhaps too closely aligned.
“Let’s make no mistake, Canada’s gone from three national networks to two and that is not a positive thing [for competition]. More networks are a good thing,” Ken Engelhart, senior vice-president of regulatory affairs for Rogers said at the same Canadian Telecom Summit earlier this month.
“This is not a modest sharing of the radio access network, this is a single network. They used to each have a network, now they share one,” he said.
Early next year Industry Canada will sell to carriers spectrum, or airwave frequencies, ideal for delivering Internet signals to smartphones. Rogers and others, including Wind parent Globalive Wireless Management Corp., suggest Bell and Telus will almost certainly partner again, combining their new holdings to deliver mobile signals across vast stretches of the country that will be faster — and cheaper to deploy — than any of their unallied rivals can hope to achieve in the near term.
Still, Industry Canada, the federal department overseeing the sale, has no qualms with Bell and Telus or any other carriers who share resources, including spectrum, as long as the operators are competing for customers at the retail level. The caveat is that “associated entities” must declare intentions before the auction, and demonstrate they are not colluding.
Partnerships will also trigger “build-out requirements” from which unaffiliated providers will be exempt, forcing joint network operators to build deeper into rural areas.
Competitors argue the conditions lack teeth, while the auction’s unique bidding structure gives an unfair advantage to the two incumbents.
“I don’t understand why competing at the retail level would act as a ‘get out of jail free card’. We’re talking about one entity sharing spectrum and a network. Why should competing at the retail level have anything to do with [allowing Bell and Telus to share spectrum]? It seems to me artificial,” said a person close to regulatory matters at Globalive who spoke on condition of anonymity.
“What you really want to do if you want competition at the retail level is make sure everyone is on a level playing field,” the person said.
Executives for Wind, the biggest of the upstart corps of carriers that includes Mobilicity and Quebec cable operator Vidéotron, point to the vast spectrum holdings of the Big Three, which according to Industry Canada’s data stand at 85% of all frequency licences in private hands, combined (Rogers holding 41%, BCE with 29% and Telus with 15%).
Wind, which acquired a 3% sliver in the last auction in 2008, has argued new entrants need more if they are to compete legitimately and avoid being bought out by Rogers, Bell or Telus.
If the buy-out scenario plays out, new-entrant executives suggest pricing will move inexorably back up as the oligopolistic hold the three industry giants exercised before late 2009 returns — when rates were the highest per customer among G8 countries, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch data.
To prevent this, Industry Canada has carved up four “prime” blocks to sell while capping the three incumbents to purchasing only one apiece in each jurisdiction, a design that Industry Minister Christian Paradis believes will guard the competitiveness of the marketplace.
Telus’ Mr. McFarlane, who said he is satisfied with the auction design, concurred. “They essentially reinforced a four-player industry structure,” he said.
Executives from both Telus and Bell noted during the summit that there is nothing stopping other operators from striking similar sharing agreements. They noted carriers in other countries have also undertaken such deals to save money and speed up roll-outs. Last week, Spanish giant Telefónica announcing an alliance with British operator Vodafone to share infrastructure on a joint high-speed wireless network in the United Kingdom, for example.
“We [Telus and Bell] compete vigorously in downstream markets.” Ted Woodhead, vice-president of regulatory affairs said during a panel last week that featured Rogers’ Mr. Engelhart and the regulatory chiefs of the other operators.
“Incidentally, all of these guys have talked about or their CEOs have talked about [spectrum and network sharing] but have failed to actually step up to the plate,” he said.
Raj Rajput [ MBA ]
Mobile Reviews Expert
On Line Assistence :
Gtalk : aerosoft.Raj@gmail.com
Y! Messenger : Raj.AeroSoft@yahoo.com
Rediff Bol : Raj.AeroSoft@rediffmail.com
MSN : Raj.AeroSoft@hotmail.com
Mexico América Móvil ,
Spain Telefónica (Movistar, O2 & Vivo)
France Orange,
Finland/Sweden TeliaSonera,
Saudi Arabia Saudi Telecom Company (STC)
South Africa MTN Group
United Arab Emirates Etisalat ,
India Reliance Communications ,
Germany T-Mobile ,
United States Verizon Wireless ,
Russia MTS ,
United States AT&T Mobility
China China Telecom,
Indonesia Telkomsel,
India Idea Cellular,
India BSNL,
India Tata Teleservices,
Italy Telecom Italia / TIM
Malaysia Maxis Communications
Turkey Turkcell
Qatar Qtel
Spain Telefónica (Movistar, O2 & Vivo)
France Orange,
Finland/Sweden TeliaSonera,
Saudi Arabia Saudi Telecom Company (STC)
South Africa MTN Group
United Arab Emirates Etisalat ,
India Reliance Communications ,
Germany T-Mobile ,
United States Verizon Wireless ,
Russia MTS ,
United States AT&T Mobility
China China Telecom,
Indonesia Telkomsel,
India Idea Cellular,
India BSNL,
India Tata Teleservices,
Italy Telecom Italia / TIM
Malaysia Maxis Communications
Turkey Turkcell
Qatar Qtel
Mobile Opreter,
China China Mobile ,
United Kingdom Vodafone,
India Airtel,
For Franchisee, call : For Bookings (birthday & marriage party)   | ||
| to Best Mobile Review | ||
| Best Mobile Handset Mobile Review Best Mobile Operator Review Best Blackberry Mobile Review Best iphones Reviews SEO JOBS
|
|
|
All Aviation News
Raj Rajput [ MBA ]
On Line Assistence :
Gtalk : aerosoft.Raj@gmail.com
Y! Messenger : Raj.AeroSoft@yahoo.com
Rediff Bol : Raj.AeroSoft@rediffmail.com
MSN : Raj.AeroSoft@hotmail.com
blackberry
blackberry prices,
blackberry phones,
blackberry desktop manager,
blackberry app world,
blackberry internet service,
blackberry playbook
blackberry apps
airtel blackberry
blackberry prices,
blackberry phones,
blackberry app world,
blackberry internet service,
blackberry playbook
blackberry apps
airtel blackberry
Raj Rajput [ MBA ]
Mobile Reviews Expert
On Line Assistence :
Gtalk : aerosoft.Raj@gmail.com
Y! Messenger : Raj.AeroSoft@yahoo.com
Rediff Bol : Raj.AeroSoft@rediffmail.com
MSN : Raj.AeroSoft@hotmail.com
apple,
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| to Best Mobile Review | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Best Mobile Handset Mobile Review Best Mobile Operator Review Best Blackberry Mobile Review Best iphones Reviews
|
No comments:
Post a Comment